FACT: 在法庭上,刘牧野不否认自己是老菜头与 freespeech 。
我反对文件中写道:【Liu did not and does not deny that he was also "LAO CAITOU" (DOE 2) and
"freespeech" (DOE 3) in the Alameda action and the current action. Liu made the same false
statements about Plaintiff... Plaintiff therefore includes the statements made by DOE 2 and DOE 3 below. 】
在证据法 (Law of Evidence)中,这叫着 adoptive admission,逻辑依据与数学中的反证法一致。法院在判决中包含了 DOE 3 的言论就说明了这一点。起诉书中涉及杨文彬的诽谤言论当然不是刘牧野动议可以去要求撤诉的,同理,除非 DOE 3就是刘牧野,那么他的撤诉动议也不可能涉及,因为他没有 standing,他不能替别人要求撤诉。