@LluisMontoliu@PLOSSynbio@GaetanBurgio@ISTT_TG@Addgene@NatureBiotech The disapproval of NgAgo sounds like adverts 4 CRISPR. Why?
日志
我对澳洲及西班牙 NgAgo 研究者的质疑
热度 1 ||
下面是我对澳洲学者 BURGIO与西班牙学者MONTOLIU的质疑，以及部分回复。
我对澳洲学者 BURGIO博士质疑说：“你的实验失败了，你进行了报告。但这不能说明 NgAgo 不行。”
BURGIO回答说：“我同意你的说法。但这不是我博文里说的。请再读我的博文。”
我还说：“你的博文没有理性。你未能做出不等于没人能做出。你匆忙的结论可能到时回头困扰你。”
对此，BURGIO 承认他没做出来等于别人做不出来，只是目前没有人说做出来。
我对西班牙的MONTOLIU博士说：“你否定NgAgo的言辞听起来像是给 CRISPR 打广告。为什么？”
我还说：“耐心是一种美德。一次NgAgo成功就可以证明它可行。为什么这么急于结论？”
对此，PLOS 合成生物组回应说：“同意。NgAgo 也许是非常好的工具。所以追问为什么无人重复很重要。”
@LluisMontoliu@PLOSSynbio@GaetanBurgio@ISTT_TG@Addgene@NatureBiotech Patience is a virtue.1 NgAgo success can vindicate.Why the rush?
@YDX2015 agreed, NgoAgo might be a great new tool. Which is why it is important to find out why nobody else has got it to work.
岳东晓 
PLOS Synbio @GaetanBurgio So, your experiment failed, and you reported it. But that does not prove that NgAgo is a no go.
@YDX2015 Agree with you. What you said is not what I have written. Please read my post again
@GaetanBurgio Your blog is irrational. That you failed doesn't mean no one can succeed. The rushed conclusion may come back to haunt you.
@YDX2015 I agree my failure doesn't mean it doesn't work but nobody has reported success yet. If it works for you, please show your data
Gaetan Burgio 
