日志
帮这样的人值得吗 ？ -- 论李永
热度 12 |||
刚看到翰山写道，他攻击本博时，李永 (aka 美人蕉）暗中提供炮弹。
我当然不怕谁提供再多的炮弹攻击。但是李永的行为却令人深思。
2007年1月28日，李永给我发了一个邮件，说看了我在贺梅案中写的辩论，有案子需要我帮助，我很快查看其案件的案卷并建议道:
【It's unusual that the district court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment without writing an opinion. He simply referred to defendants' brief. I think that alone should be ground for reversal/remand. You have to understand summary judgment. Basically, the defendants say that all facts are clear, and all facts point to their favour. What you need to do is to show that there are some facts in dispute and those facts may convince someone (jury) to reach a verdict in your favour after a trial.So, the thing to do is to lay out your case clearly and show there may be facts that can support your claims. To support a discrmination claim, you must show they treat you differently from others based on race, color, sex, etc.】
之后，李永给我发来她的上诉文件稿，我回应到：【You have background in science, you need to treat the legal battle as a science project. You have a set of facts and a set of rules (statutes, cases, procedures), the key is to fit the facts into the rules and compute an end result you want. So, it's also like programming. It's like your code collects some data, then invoking APIs and system calls to reaching a halting state which is in your favour. When you state the facts, you must remove anything emotional and argumentative. Then you apply the rules and make arguments. Frankly, after reading your statement of facts, I got confused and lost. You have to explain your case in a very simple manner.The fact the same judge treating two similar cases differently is strong evidence in your favour. I am sure the circuit court will try its best to find excuses for the district judge, let's wait and see.】
针对其文件中的具体内容，我写道：【I am confused on what was going on. Why did you file a discrimination complaint because someone cornered you into a small room? For me, someone cornered you into a room just demonstrate that he was kind of rude...】。
【Frankly. Your brief needs too much work. You must be able to explain the case within the first 3 parapgrahs, but I can't get the essence of it by reading it. For instance, you did allege that you were the only Chinese in the group. But, you did NOT allege that your supervisor treated all non-Chinese co-workers differently from treating you. For discrimination, you must allege you were treated differently. If she treated a white or a Chinese both in the same rude way, that is not discrimination, it just means she was a rude person. But if she treated whites real nice but was real tough on you, that's discrimination.】
【Regardless of whether Lewis' treatment of you was time barred, you must plead the claims properly. For the claimed retaliatory action against your protected activity (complaining about discrimination), you must also plead properly. It is not enough to state that you were not given assignments with security clearance as an excuse, you must plead that that excuse was false and there were other assignment potentially available, and you must plead that the withholding of assignments was linked to your original discrimination complaint. Of course, whether there is a link is a triable fact.
For the question of "kill someone", what you presented might be rude conduct, but it is unclear it's retaliatory action based on that alone. A retaliatory action must be linked to the protected activity, and your pleading lacks that link. You have to argue on that, such as timing, etc....In some cases, the close proximity of timing alone may establish the link...】
如此详细阅读其文件，详细解释之后。我看她实在是不行，于是几乎是一字一句地帮其改写上诉文件，包括纠正其英语语法。然后主动帮她找案例。。。等等。还多次在中文媒体写文章为她争取支持。。。几乎说比幼儿园老师还耐心。为什么？
毕竟这是一个同胞据说被人欺负了都导致精神出现状况，好像有无穷的冤屈（注），不免有些同情。
很多人这样那样说贺绍强，但是我觉得贺这人其实还是不错的。
至少他不是条白眼狼，每次见到他，他都说你是我们家的恩人。
注：李永控告的依据是遭受歧视、迫害导致精神问题（后已康复）
发表评论 评论 (37 个评论)
- 回复 岳东晓
- Mr. Yang Wenbin，我给你陈述一个事实，希望你停止影射性诽谤，否则后果自负。
iMan: 你自己打官司的胜诉率有多高？比抛硬币几率高吗？100%？80%？60%？40%？20 ？ 10？
本人以原告启动的知识产权诉讼有5群被告，只有两种结果：(1) 在被告作出金钱赔偿后，双方和解 (settle)；或者（2）由陪审团及法院裁决被告败诉，并命令被告作出金钱赔偿。
本人以原告起诉的诽谤案有一件，在对方公开诚恳道歉之后，作罢。
- 回复 iMan
- 看不懂你说的。我不是法律专家，请直接给一个数字。
岳东晓: Mr. Yang Wenbin，我给你陈述一个事实，希望你停止影射性诽谤，否则后果自负。
本人以原告启动的知识产权诉讼有5群被告，只有两种结果：(1) 在被告作出金钱赔偿 ...
- 回复 iMan
- 据说你起诉7次，上诉5次，请问，这是事实吗？
岳东晓: Mr. Yang Wenbin，我给你陈述一个事实，希望你停止影射性诽谤，否则后果自负。
本人以原告启动的知识产权诉讼有5群被告，只有两种结果：(1) 在被告作出金钱赔偿 ...
- 回复 岳东晓
- 我没有兴趣回答你的问题，但是我已经明确警告你 Yang Wenbin，如果你再进行诽谤性影射，是要负法律责任的。另外，星期一我会跟你雇主联系，就你在网上威胁尤教授等事宜进行沟通。
iMan: 据说你起诉7次，上诉5次，请问，这是事实吗？
- 回复 iMan
- 岳东晓 2015-5-30 14:10
岳东晓: 我没有兴趣回答你的问题，但是我已经明确警告你 Yang Wenbin，如果你再进行诽谤性影射，是要负法律责任的。另外，星期一我会跟你雇主联系，就你在网上威胁尤教 ...
>iMan: 据说你起诉7次，上诉5次，请问，这是事实吗？
1）再说一遍：你的弱智恐吓对我就是一个白痴笑话。我老人家长期以来一直鼓励你去法院告我去警察局报案。这已经说过多次了，再说就有祥林嫂之嫌了。
2）到法庭打官司，且不说你还是原告，不论输赢都是用法律武器维护自己正当利益的光明正大的事。跟你询问此事，何来诽谤之说？侵害了你什么利益？名誉？隐私？我看一点没有啊。你不是俨然的美国法律专家嘛，你告诉我，我的询问究竟侵害了你的什么利益。
3）长期以来，你自己发微博发博文写书经常炫耀你如何打官司赢在美国，你长期以美国法律专家的口吻自作聪明地给华人普法。现在在你又在炫耀自己法律知识的博文下面跟你询问此事，何来诽谤之说？侵害了你什么利益？你究竟怕什么？
4）长期以来，你对我进行大量的多方面的诽谤和威胁，铁证如山！就是现在你还诽谤我在网上威胁尤明庆祝，诽谤我是什么什么什么。。。，威胁要到我所有潜在的雇主，我现在的雇主，我的专业协会那里去诽谤我、诬告我。这些严重的恶意诽谤、可耻的诬告和恐吓威胁都是违法行为！我再一次严正警告你 - 岳东晓：立即彻底停止对我的诽谤、诬告和威胁！
5）我再一次明确告诉你，你想用诽谤、诬告和威胁这些违法的下三滥行为阻止我对你那白痴可笑的上楼梯力学分析等的嘲笑批驳是痴心妄想！我根本不怕你的任何下三滥行为。像在任何领域，我老人家要么不出手，只要一出手就把你打翻在地。在物理上、在法律上、在网上、在法庭上都是这样。
6）你周一给我的雇主和专业协会的电话诽谤诬告的结果别忘了在这里公布一下啊。还有，给我所有潜在雇主的信你发出去多少份了，请经常UPDATE我一下。你赶快去法院起诉我诽谤、威胁吧，我等着法院的传票。
7）ONCE AGAIN：据说你起诉7次，上诉5次，请问，这是事实吗？如果是事实，那这12次中法庭判你赢的是几次？如果你不好意思公开回答，可以私信告诉我，我答应给你保密。
- 回复 ojx111
- 没有败过, 也可说都赢了
岳东晓: Mr. Yang Wenbin，我给你陈述一个事实，希望你停止影射性诽谤，否则后果自负。
本人以原告启动的知识产权诉讼有5群被告，只有两种结果：(1) 在被告作出金钱赔偿 ...
- 回复 iMan
- 他那点智商忽悠你们可能够了。到我这里，他一张嘴我就能把他一眼从天灵盖看到XXX了。跟我玩他跟方枪枪的智商加起来是肯定不够的，乘起来够不够都不好说。
ojx111: 没有败过, 也可说都赢了
- 回复 ojx111
- 你得拿出点真实数据支持自己啊. 你光凭一句话, 谁会相信你?
iMan: 他那点智商忽悠你们可能够了。到我这里，他一张嘴我就能把他一眼从天灵盖看到XXX了。跟我玩他跟方枪枪的智商加起来是肯定不够的，乘起来够不够都不好说。 ...
- 回复 iMan
- 1）5群被告是5件独立的案子吗？2）”5次上诉“是谣言吗？3）法庭若没判他赢，你我怎么知道他赢了？
ojx111: 原告启动的知识产权诉讼总共有五件, 诽谤案一件
他没有败过, 也可说都赢了
- 回复 iMan
- 一半有什么用？”HALF TRUTH， WHOLE LIE“ ？
ojx111: 你的问题 "据说你起诉7次，上诉5次，请问，这是事实吗？"
老岳算回答了一半. 但他没有答复你的 '据说'? ...
